Rado Coupole M Women's Quartz Watch R22850713
$269.00
Product code: R22850713
Availability: In stock
Quick Overview:
Rado Coupole M Women's Quartz Watch R22850713 watches are more AAA good quality,review, we find that many people desire to have more than one replica watches, they want to express their different taste from other people on certain occasions.May be you not sure if this kinds of replica watches quality are good or not.We must say you can complete peace of your mind.The Production and processing of our R22850713 watches are strictly in accordance with the national standards.
Details
Condition:New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) and/or with the original tags attached.See all condition definitions opens in a new window or tab about the condition
Brand: Rado
Dial Hands:Rose Gold Tone Hands
MPN: R22850713
Dial Markers:Stick Index Diamond Set
Gender:Women's
Bezel Material:Stainless Steel
Case Shape:Round
Movement:Swiss Quartz (Battery-Powered)
Case Material:Stainless Steel and Rose Gold Plated PVD Coated
Crown:Pull and Push Crown Gold Tone
Case Width:32 mm
Band Type:Bracelet
Water Resistance:50 m (165 feet)
Band Material:Stainless & Plated Metal
Crystal:Sapphire Crystal Scratch Resistant
Band Color:Silver and Rose Gold
Case Thickness:8 mm
Band Width:13 mm
Case Back:Snap Back Closed
Band Length:7 inches
Case Length:42 mm
Band Clasp:Double Folding Clasp with Push Button
Dial Color:Black
Case Finish:Polished
UPC: Does not apply
EAN: 7612819048161
[Rating:(
So in the process of correspondence with Christopher Ward regarding my recent purchase of a C11 Titanium Elite Chronometer dive watch I became aware of a discrepancy in their on line literature regarding the movement. In one place it is identified as an ETA 2824-2 COSC and in another (the owners manual) as a Sellita SW 220-1 COSC. Upon contacting CW I recieved the following reply:"With regard to your previous email (and I apologise for the tardy response to this) about the movement in the watc
I must say, that I very much liked the looks of the original Beasts and T-Rex. It really does appear as if these watches are assembled and finished nicely. I think everyone would probably agree with that. What I can't understand is, while the watches certainly look top-notch, why would a G10 movement be utilized in these? Is it more of a jewelry piece than watch? It really does look as if no expense was spared with the case and bracelet, but I just can't get over that movement. You'd thin
